Here's what happened. I called his bet, forcing me all in. He had Q 10 for a bigger full house, and I busted out.
I've been thinking about it. First, why did he call my very large bet pre-flop with Q 10, which is a good hand but not great hand? OK, he had a lot of chips, but he should have known I was starting with a better hand. He got lucky on the flop with three Qs, so I understand why he called my bet after the flop. Then on the turn, he got the nuts, a full house. I think he should have bet because he didn't know if the next card would give me a better hand. Suppose I had KK, and the next card was a K. If he'd bet on the turn, I would have folded. When the river card came, he no longer had the nuts. If I had A♥K♥, 9♥8♥, or QxJx, all of which were in my range, I would have beat him. I think he should have just called my bet. Anyway, it's very hard to fold a full house, especially holding a pair in my hand.
On the other hand, he won and I busted out, so maybe I'm wrong. I could have played more conservatively. I have a general rule that few players bluff shove on the river, so I only call if I have a great hand. And I did have a great hand. And I feel like if I fold a big full house on the river, then players can get me to fold any hand on the river by shoving.
He could very easily have QX, JX, 10 10, any heart or str. draw possibly KK AA. I would call myself, really interested in what you did and what he had. With the way some people play today he could have done that with 7 2 LOL
For me, this is a relatively easy call. He may have hit a flush, and suspects that you have a straight. I know he could have QJ or QT or AhKh, but I think this is a call.
Thanks for the feedback, everyone.
Here's what happened. I called his bet, forcing me all in. He had Q 10 for a bigger full house, and I busted out.
I've been thinking about it. First, why did he call my very large bet pre-flop with Q 10, which is a good hand but not great hand? OK, he had a lot of chips, but he should have known I was starting with a better hand. He got lucky on the flop with three Qs, so I understand why he called my bet after the flop. Then on the turn, he got the nuts, a full house. I think he should have bet because he didn't know if the next card would give me a better hand. Suppose I had KK, and the next card was a K. If he'd bet on the turn, I would have folded. When the river card came, he no longer had the nuts. If I had A♥K♥, 9♥8♥, or QxJx, all of which were in my range, I would have beat him. I think he should have just called my bet. Anyway, it's very hard to fold a full house, especially holding a pair in my hand.
On the other hand, he won and I busted out, so maybe I'm wrong. I could have played more conservatively. I have a general rule that few players bluff shove on the river, so I only call if I have a great hand. And I did have a great hand. And I feel like if I fold a big full house on the river, then players can get me to fold any hand on the river by shoving.
Call!
He could very easily have QX, JX, 10 10, any heart or str. draw possibly KK AA. I would call myself, really interested in what you did and what he had. With the way some people play today he could have done that with 7 2 LOL
For me, this is a relatively easy call. He may have hit a flush, and suspects that you have a straight. I know he could have QJ or QT or AhKh, but I think this is a call.
He could also have QQ, which would be in keeping with Bob’s luck of late.
Now that I think about it, I bet Bob called & dude had QQ.
Call.
Also, has Lindell paid?
Still no. He's refusing to turn over a list of his assets as required by the court. Plus he's appealing the decision for the second time.
Bummer.
Fold